Film, Nancy Ghertner, And Each Of The Five Immigrant

After I Pick the Fruit records the lives of five immigrant farmworker women, only two of them are documented over approximately a ten-year span. This film shows the development of several friendships made between the filmmaker, Nancy Ghertner, and each of the five immigrant farmworker women. This documentary illustrates the struggle these women go through to satisfy their roles as workers, as well as wives and mothers. As the filmmaker learned more about these women, she made it her goal to raise awareness in the United States about the cost of having fresh produce at their grocery store. Nancy also made me look at what is found at the dining halls on campus, and how they got there. One impactful theme conveyed in After I Pick the Fruit†¦show more content†¦Another trend is also illustrated in this film is the cheap labor force of these immigrant workers. Thus, this trend depicted in this film resembling the trends found in domestic work. Since these women are misrepresented in politics, small programs within the U.S. must create awareness for these low wages. For instance, one worker stated that she was paid $.28 per tree, making it way below what the average American would make doing the same job. Another theme is illegal immigration. During the Bush Administration, there was a major post-9/11 crackdown on illegal immigration, which was pivotal and shown in this film. Although this film represents an increase regulation, it still had the same impact deregulation had during the Reagan Administration by hindering the success of the poor in foreign countries. There were a series of raids, depicted in this film, by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents to attempt to crackdown on illegal immigration. These raids affected more than just these women immigrants; it also affected their families, other farmers, and residents near Sodus, NY. One attempt to crackdown on illegal immigration that really moved me was when one woman learned that ICE detained her husband at their local grocery store during an early morning raid. In addition, this film documents the shocked reaction of a farmer, whose employee is detained at the corner of a coffee shop. These people are just trying

Corporate Social Responsibility in the Marketplace

In understanding the subject of social responsibility in business, there are many varying views and theories presented. The argument, at the extremes, is one that is purely economic in nature and the other that requires corporation’s responsibility to society. Today society demands social responsiveness of businesses in the marketplace. A businesses’ failure to act socially or ethically responsible, in some cases, could form the foundation for its own peril. My paper attempts to define social responsibility, discuss views and theories, and provide case examples where businesses respond to situations in the global marketplace. The argument that corporation’s responsibility to shareholders to maximize profits as a sole objective is no longer†¦show more content†¦This is the voice of the laisser-faire 1980s. Elaine Sternberg, a classicist advocate, who argues that there is a human rights case against Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR), which is that a st akeholder approach to management deprives shareholders of their property rights. She states that the objectives sought by conventional views of social responsibility are absurd. Not all aspects of CSR are guilty of this, however. Sternberg states that ordinary decency, honesty, and fairness are expected of any corporation† (Baker). â€Å"The corporate citizen theory argues that businesses have an obligation to do good for society (Cheeseman 160). Businesses have a duty to society to help solve problems that they did not cause. This theory aligns best with the socioeconomic view of social responsibility. â€Å"The socioeconomic view requires management’s responsibility to surpass making profits to include protecting and improving society’s welfare. This view sees that corporations are not independent entities, responsible only to stockholders. Corporations also have the responsibility to the larger society that endorses their creation through laws and regulation s and supports them by purchasing their products and services. Organizations are expected and encouraged to become involved socially, politically, and legally† (Robbins/Coulter 100-01). From the classic economic or maximizing profits view to theShow MoreRelatedLiving Up to Ethical and Social Responsibilities: The Case of Occidental Petroleum Corporation1394 Words   |  6 PagesLiving Up to Ethical and Social Responsibilities: The Case of Occidental Petroleum Corporation Introduction The recent assassination of a U.S. ambassador in Libya and the rampant anti-American sentiments being expressed in other parts of the world is proof positive that many American-based multinational are faced with a hostile operating environment that demands informed and timely responses. Likewise, many multinational corporations are subscribing to calls for giving back to the communityRead MoreRecycling Recycling1006 Words   |  5 Pagesmore regulated. The recycling of paper cups should be more regulated and that is due to the Corporate Social Responsibility that each organization should have. Corporate social responsibility is the way a corporation achieves a balance among its economic, social, and environmental responsibilities in its operations so as to address shareholder and other stakeholder expectations. According to a CBC Marketplace investigation that was done in 2015, some Starbucks’ and Tim Hortons’ in Toronto paper cupsRead MoreCorporate Social Responsibility : Milton Friedman1083 Words   |  5 Pagespreached against corporate social responsibility as a goal to American businessman. His concepts, and arguments, has been their foundation for fiscal success thereby generating end-profit for shareholders. However, over the past 40-years, financiers have realized not only do they owe earnest to their shareholders but also their customers. The government and society have both found roles to play in the future of big business in America. That-being, corporate social responsibility (CSR) has provenRead MoreEvaluation of a Business Code of Ethics1271 Words   |  6 Pages PHL/323 Mission Statement Hershey’s Mission Statement noted here, (Social- Responsibility/Marketplace) â€Å"Bringing sweet moments of Hershey happiness to the world every day,† Provides the focus of all operations within the Hershey’s Company. Although Hershey’s mission statement provides a simple goal that encompasses acknowledgment ofRead MoreNike: the Sweatshop Debate Essay1494 Words   |  6 Pagesto the workers. The company still must follow the labor laws of the hosting country (Hill, 2009). Nike decided to create and design the product and use manufacturing companies outside of the United States. Nike has continued to soar in the marketplace and in 2006, Nike’s annual revenue was 15 billion dollars, sold Nike apparel in140 countries and had a global manufacturing network of 600 factories and employed 650,000 people. If someone were looking at the financials of Nike, one would see aRead MoreExamining the Corporate Social Responsibility Claims of Kelloggs1715 Words   |  7 Pagescompany that has always stated its dedication to being a leader in industry, innovation and marketing. (Kellogg) CSR Kellogg’s claim that corporate responsibility has always been a vital part of their heritage, and that they have always had a strong commitment to nutrition, health and quality. They maintain their stance that the ever-greater social challenges, such as feeding a growing population, battling world hunger, improving nutrition and addressing the obesity epidemic have been historically—andRead MoreThe Role Of Social Media On The Marketplace Essay1743 Words   |  7 PagesCommunicating In the Marketplace The all encompassing Internet and more recent evolution of Social Media have not only fundamentally changed how corporations communicate internally, but also enabled before unimaginable methods of reaching a global marketplace. Unlike never before, even small businesses are now able to reach beyond their limited local market to a vast consumer base. As previously mentioned in regards to internal communication, the Internet has provided a medium for businesses toRead MoreCorporate Social Responsiblity and Wal-Mart914 Words   |  4 PagesCorporate Social Responsibility and Wal-Mart Corporations deal with a wide variety of social issues and problems; some directly related to their operations, some are not. Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) can be defined as â€Å"the actions of an organization that are targeted toward achieving a social benefit over and above maximizing profits for its shareholders and meeting all its legal obligations† (Ghillyer 78). If this is the case, establishing appropriate and practical ethical guidelinesRead MoreThe Problems of Social Responsibility1350 Words   |  5 Pages1. INTRODUCTION Combine Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) into strategic management is making and increase profit to a companys business. In recent year, the importance of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) has gradually become a very concern to industries. Hence, there have been gradually increasing tensions with many companies and increase the responsibility of managers try to carry out Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) to society. In fact, managers should be having knowledge and understandingRead MoreBrief Corporate History and Corporate Communication Practices1630 Words   |  7 Pages Brief Corporate History and Corporate Communication Practices The company eBay Inc that was named AuctionWeb back then was borned back in September 1995 in San Jose, California by the founder, Pierre Omidyar who was a computer programmer. eBay Inc is a multinational Internet consumer-to-consumer corporation where it was a marketplace for individuals for sale of goods and services. Jeff Skoll was hired as the first president of the company after a year. In 1997, Auction Web officially changed its

Critically Evaluate the Role of Leaders free essay sample

Critically evaluate the role of leaders and managers contributes to employee motivation and engagement within organisations Introduction As Anderson says (2010), organizational success not only requires project managers not only handle projects, but also lead employees. Managers and leaders must possess knowledge, skills, tools, and experiences therefore employees will to follow them. For organization, to gain and sustain employees can not only create value and high levels of performance, but also as the only vehicle through which an organizational goals are accomplished. More importantly, the best style of leaderships is more than one style; it depends on followers’ needs. As we know that management engages in the process of integrating work activities therefore people can complete work more efficient. According to Mullins (2005), management is a process with enables organizations to set and achieve objectives by planning organization amp; controlling their resources, including their resources, including gaining the commitment of their employee. The process of management involves sets of ongoing decisions and action in which managers engage as they plan, organize, lead and control. As Laurie (2005) says, management strives for high efficiency and high effectiveness. Management exists in different kinds of organization. Organization is more likely a tool used by people by coordinate their different actions to obtain something they desire to. In terms of Otara (2001), a good organization structure does not by itself produce good performance without leaders and mangers. Leaders and managers in organization need to know the main influences on behaviour in work organizations and the nature of the people. According to Otara (2011), managers and leaders in organization are entrusted with employees whom they must work with and through to realize organizational objectives. In organizations, perceptions of leaders, managers and employees shape the climate and effectiveness of the working environment. This paper firstly focus on the critical review the role of leadership and management in supporting employees’ motivation with relevant motivation theory, and then critical review how leaders and managers in achieving employee engagement today. The reason of leaders and mangers in motivating individuals In terms of the study of Robert (2001), a leader or a manager must first be motivated within in order to inspire others to action. A good leader and manager can motivate others can turn a difficult situation into a learning experience. In terms of motivating, Mullins (2005) has identified four common characteristics of motivation. First, motivation is typified as an individual phenomenon. This means that everyone is unique and all the major theories of motivation allow for this uniqueness to be demonstrated in one way or another. Second, motivation is usually as intentional, which means that motivation is assumed to be under the workers’ control and behaviours are influenced by motivation. Third, motivation is multifaceted and the fourth is that motivational theory is to predict behaviour. Motivation concerns action, and the internal and external forces which influence a person’s choice of action. Leadership in supporting individual motivation Leader is the people telling people do the right things and manager is the people who telling people do the things right. Mathis (2007) emphasizes that effective leaders build bridges, which means that a good leader not only connect past but also present future to employees. A good leader is always keeping employee performing at high levels in their work. Moreover, there are two important styles of leadership: transactional and transformational. Transformational is about leaders raise individual’s motivation, while transaction focuses on exchange between leaders and individuals.. Both of Caldwell, Truong, and Tuan (2011) have suggested that transformational leadership require leaders keep a commitment to motivate individuals to achieve excellence. In terms of Mathisen, Einarsen, and Mykletun (2010), leaders are treated as role models, who always requiring followers inspired by them. In this sense, leaders directly influence individual motivation through their behaviour, personality, encourage and discourage. Leaders can also indirectly influence individual motivation through building a favourable work climate. Management in motivating individuals According to Hindle (2008) emphasizes Fayol’s management theory includes planning, organizing, commanding, coordinating, and controlling. This approach differs from others since from the bottom up. Fayol starts with the most elemental units of activity, worker’s actions, and then to study the effects of their actions on productivity, discover new methods to make employees more efficient, and applied what he learns at lower levels to the hierarchy. Fayol also looked for management principles which could be applied to wider organizations. In terms of motivation, this paper focuses on Maslow’s hierarchy of needs model and Herzberg’s two-factor theory with relevance examples. In terms of Maslow’s theory, employee always wants more. This hierarchy of needs include five in total, which are physiological, safety, love, esteem, and self-actualization. Physiological comes from human nature. Safety likes working safety and security. Love refers to receive and give love. Esteem includes self-respect and esteem of others. Self-actualization needs are about development of person’s full potential. All these five needs display in a pyramid structure. After lower needs been achieved, leaders and managers need to transfer to focus on higher ones. Moreover, Maslow indicates that the hierarchy is not necessarily a fixed order and it relatively universal among different cultures. So there still exist some difficulties to relate this theory to real word. In terms of manager and leaders, they not only need to understand employees’ life during work, but also need an overview understanding of employees’ family and social life. Even so, different individual means that people may place different values on the same need, for example, motivation factors may not the same for people at the same level of needs. In terms of Herzberg’s two-factor theory, the hygiene factors are factors which causing working dissatisfaction. Hygiene factors connect to job environment. Dealing with hygiene factors is aiming to avoid dissatisfaction in work. Motivating factors relate to works. Hygiene factors associated with low needs of Maslow’s theory and motivators factors associated with high level of Maslow’s theory. For leaders and managers, they need give attention to the motivators or hygiene factors. Moreover, this theory suggests that if leaders and managers are ready to provide positive motivation, they need to pay attention to both of these two factors instead of one only. The requirements in leaders and managers in engaging employees In general, there are four phases in process of engagement. First, satisfaction with the job, employee who overall enjoys the job, satisfied with the terms and conditions. Second, employees energetic with jobs and strive to achieve personal goals more than team ones. Third, employees usually work well in teams. Final, employees contribute defending the organization. According to Yukl (2008), leadership is about setting a new direction for a group, while management is about directing and controlling according to established principles. In terms leaders and mangers, Otara (2011) has emphases that in general, leaders and managers are possessing three major skills within organizations, these four skills include vision, interpersonal skills, perception skills and technical skills. Moreover, Simanskene and Trarasevicius (2010) emphasize that without these four skills from employers, employees are likely to be low productivity in the whole engagement. Therefore if leaders and managers access to achieve engagement, it is necessary for them to possess all of these four skills. Non-core role engagement as a new solution Study of Trahant (2007) has argued employee engagement tends to be a leading indicator in working performance, especially in public sectors. The more engaged employee, the more effective the organization will be. However, the study of Welbourne (2007) has shown only 14 per cent to 30 per cent of employees are engaged at work today. In terms of leaders and manages in achieving employee engagement, many people may think that engagement means long-term commitment, marriage, and family. In 1980s, Japanese employers expected loyalty therefore offered lifetime employment to employees. But now, globalization has changed workforce and skilled employees are not willing overtime and extra effort. This leads to productivity decrease. In terms of Woodruffe (2006), many leaders and managers are outdated and simply thinking that employees would give good work performances just since company hires them. Actually, there are some non-financial factors which determine employees’ working place besides money factor. As Welbourne (2007) states, role-based performance model is a new option to provide employee engagement in the respect of behaviours. This model helps leaders and managers to identify types of behaviours needed from employees and the result of employee’s engagement in non-core job role would be new ideas today. The process of leaders and mangers in achieving engagement According to Welbourne (2007), in today’s employment market, employers concern on where they work since they may go somewhere else if they do not feel being developed. Therefore leaders and managers need to understand training and development to their employees, especially to talented employees. As mention before, in order to promote good environment in core and non-core roles, these following things are necessary for leaders and managers to do. First, leaders and managers need to be engaged first, this requires they need familiar with core and non-core roles. Second, leaders and managers need to how role of core and non-core roles help to support the organization’s strategy and plan, therefore can give correct and effective orders. Moreover, leaders and managers need to remove barriers to employee’s working between core and non-core roles. According to the role-based model, leadership education is necessary for employers to create an environment that core and non-core roles are treated as the same. Moreover, to engage employees in the right roles at the right time, leaders and managers can conduct assessments to understand the determinants of engagement. Oppositely, disengaged employees can costs as much as billions. Conclusion Towards to the leadership and management in motivating individuals within organization, transactional and transformational leadership styles are essential for leaders. In terms of managers, Maslow’s hierarchy of needs model, leaders and managers need to motivate their employees from physiological needs, safety needs, love needs, esteem needs, and self-actualization needs. In terms of Herzberg’s two-factor theories, leaders and managers need to motivate their employees from hygiene and motivating factors. General speaking, the hygiene factors equal to lower Maslow’s theory and motion factors equal to higher Maslow’s theory. Towards to the leaders and managers in contributing employee engagement, it has been argued that leaders and managers themselves are required to posse’s vision skills, interpersonal skills, and technical skills, and perception skills. After that, the role-based performance model provides useful ideas that employee’s engagement in non-core job role would be new ideas today. Leaders and managers not only need to close the gap between core and non-core job roles, but also need to conduct from a transformative leadership angle to achieve employee engagement and act as model roles. Engaging talented people needs to be a top organizational priority because they likely to find another organization if not feel satisfaction and sense of self-worth. More importantly, it is worth for leaders and mangers to distinguish the differences between engaging employees through helping them and simply want to give their best for the jobs.